SwarmiaAurora Coach
Starting pointMetrics, surveys, and working agreementsThe team’s own context, every period
BreadthDelivery flow and developer experienceSix domains of team effectiveness
ImprovementInsights suggest, you take it from thereA loop: analyze, recommend, commit, execute, re-evaluate
CadenceAlways-on dashboardsOne loop per period, every period
PricingPer developer, free for small teamsPublic, per user, 14-day trial

Both take the same side: teams should own how they work. The question to ask is what you need next, more visibility or a practice that turns signal into change.

How is Aurora Coach different from Swarmia?

Swarmia is the engineering intelligence tool closest to us in spirit: it wants teams to improve, not just be watched. The difference is where improvement lives. In Swarmia it starts from metrics, surveys, and working agreements, and the team takes it from there. In Aurora Coach the improvement loop is the product: every period the team gets a grounded analysis across six domains, commits to a small number of changes, and the next period shows what moved.

Is Swarmia’s free tier a reason to start there?

If what you need is visibility into delivery, yes, Swarmia is free for small teams and that is a generous place to start. If what you need is a team that steadily improves, visibility is rarely the bottleneck. The bottleneck is turning signal into changes the team actually makes, and that is the job Aurora Coach does.

Would we use Swarmia and Aurora Coach together?

Some organizations would. Swarmia gives engineers and managers delivery visibility day to day. Aurora Coach runs the improvement practice on top of signal like that, one committed loop per period. If budget forces a choice, choose based on the question you are answering: see more, or change more.